Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W
80 Imaging
46 Features
33 Overall
40
![Canon PowerShot SX410 IS front Canon PowerShot SX410 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-SX410-IS/Canon-SX410-IS-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W/Fujifilm-S9400W-front.jpg)
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-960mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 325g - 104 x 69 x 85mm
- Introduced February 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX410 IS (20MP) and Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The SX410 IS was brought out 14 months after the Fujifilm S9400W which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX410 IS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX410 IS grades against the Fujifilm S9400W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX410 IS and Fujifilm FinePix S9400W. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX410 IS Gallery and Fujifilm S9400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX410 IS over the Fujifilm S9400W
SX410 IS | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 14 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Canon SX410 IS
Fujifilm S9400W | SX410 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W
SX410 IS | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX410 IS provides exterior measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9400W has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SX410 IS versus the Fujifilm S9400W.
![Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX410-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W is 80 and 61 respectively.
![Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX410-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Canon SX410 IS to render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent SX410 IS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX410-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX410-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX410 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1700s |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.5fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325g (0.72 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 69 x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 185 images | 500 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | NB-11LH | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $199 | $330 |