Clicky

Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W

Portability
80 Imaging
45 Features
33 Overall
40
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41

Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs

Canon SX410 IS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-960mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 325g - 104 x 69 x 85mm
  • Introduced February 2015
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX410 IS (20MP) and Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX410 IS was brought out 14 months after the Fujifilm S9400W which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX410 IS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX410 IS grades against the Fujifilm S9400W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Canon SX410 IS over the Fujifilm S9400W

					

					

						
 SX410 IS Fujifilm S9400W 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2014Newer by 14 months
Focus manually  Dial accurate focusing
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Canon SX410 IS

					

					

						
 Fujifilm S9400W SX410 IS 
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Canon SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W

					

					

						
 SX410 IS Fujifilm S9400W 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither provides Touch screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison

					

					

						
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX410 IS provides exterior measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") and a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9400W has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SX410 IS versus the Fujifilm S9400W.
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W is 80 and 61 respectively.
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Canon SX410 IS to render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent SX410 IS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

						Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX410 IS Portrait photography information
Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography information
47
 manual focus
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 supports face detect autofocus
 no external flash support
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
37
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 offers face detect autofocus
 no manual focus
 no external flash support
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Canon SX410 IS Street photography details
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography details
52
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
41
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 heavier than average (670 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Canon SX410 IS Sports photography information
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography information
41
 incredible zoom range (24-960mm  40.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 continuous shooting slow (0.5 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 terrible battery pack (185 shots)
 lack of phase detect autofocus
55
 incredible zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 better than average battery power (500 shots)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX410 IS
Travel photography with Fujifilm S9400W
61
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 has built in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 great reach (960mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 terrible battery pack (185 per charge)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
54
 better than average battery power (500 shots)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 great reach (1200mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 heavier than average (670 grams)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Canon SX410 IS Landscape photography features
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography features
48
 manual focus
 rather wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 terrible battery pack (185 shots)
 does not have Timelapse recording
44
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery power (500 shots)
 no manual focus
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 lack of Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX410 IS Vlogging info
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging info
29
 rather wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 supports face detect autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
 does not have microphone port
26
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detect autofocus
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 lack of mic jack
 heavier than average (670 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
				
								
				

					

						
Canon SX410 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX410 IS and Fujifilm S9400W
 Canon PowerShot SX410 ISFujifilm FinePix S9400W
General Information
Brand Canon FujiFilm
Model type Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2015-02-06 2014-01-06
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 5152 x 3864 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-960mm (40.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing range 0cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 97 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1700s
Continuous shooting speed 0.5fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 5.00 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 325g (0.72 lbs) 670g (1.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 104 x 69 x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 185 images 500 images
Form of battery Battery Pack AA
Battery ID NB-11LH 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $199 $330