Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z400 was introduced 6 years prior to the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z400 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z400
| WG-M1 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z400 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z400 compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z400 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $2,000 |