Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Key Specs
Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Launched January 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX40 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX60 HS
FujiFilm S4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix S4050
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Canon SX50 HS versus FujiFilm S4000, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the S4000 (14MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX50 HS was brought out 2 years after the S4000 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SX50 HS scores against the S4000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & FujiFilm FinePix S4000. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & FujiFilm S4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the FujiFilm S4000
| SX50 HS | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Canon SX50 HS
| S4000 | SX50 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and FujiFilm S4000
| SX50 HS | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX50 HS enjoys outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") along with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S4000 has specifications of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX50 HS versus FujiFilm S4000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SX50 HS versus the S4000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and S4000 is 65 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and S4000.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the FujiFilm S4000 to offer more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SX50 HS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Portrait photography details
FujiFilm S4000 Portrait photography details
manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX50 HS
Street photography with FujiFilm S4000
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (595 grams)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (540 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX50 HS
Sports photography with FujiFilm S4000
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
provides tracking focus
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Travel photography highlights
FujiFilm S4000 Travel photography highlights
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (595 grams)
low resolution (12MP)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (540g)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Landscape photography features
FujiFilm S4000 Landscape photography features
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (2.8 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Vlogging details
FujiFilm S4000 Vlogging details
decently wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition (595g)
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (540g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S4000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 |
| Also Known as | - | FinePix S4050 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-15 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.8" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 202k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lbs) | 540 grams (1.19 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NB-10L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $429 | $279 |