Clicky

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR

Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
55
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front
 
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs

Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Succeeded the Canon SX40 HS
  • Replacement is Canon SX60 HS
Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Introduced April 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview

In this article, we will be looking at the Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is pretty close but the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SX50 HS was announced 3 years after the Fujifilm F200EXR which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the SX50 HS grades vs the Fujifilm F200EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 SX50 HS Fujifilm F200EXR 
IntroducedJanuary 2013April 2009Newer by 46 months
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Canon SX50 HS

 Fujifilm F200EXR SX50 HS 
Screen sizing3"2.8"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR

 SX50 HS Fujifilm F200EXR 
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX50 HS has got outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") having a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SX50 HS and the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR is 65 and 93 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR.

Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The SX50 HS includes the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF more difficult. The more recent SX50 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Portrait photography information
Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography information
48
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
features face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
21
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX50 HS
Street photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
57
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than others (595g)
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon SX50 HS as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm F200EXR as a Sports photography camera
39
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
28
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Travel photography highlights
Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography highlights
53
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others (595g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
57
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX50 HS
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
45
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (2.8")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
38
rather wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX50 HS
Vlogging with Fujifilm F200EXR
58
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
missing mic support
heavier than others (595 grams)
28
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR
 Canon PowerShot SX50 HSFujifilm FinePix F200EXR
General Information
Make Canon FujiFilm
Model type Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-01-15 2009-04-30
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.6"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8 x 6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 48.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-6.5 f/3.3-5.1
Macro focusing distance 0cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 2.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 202 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.50 m 4.30 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 595 gr (1.31 pounds) 205 gr (0.45 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 179 not tested
Other
Battery life 315 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-10L NP-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $429 $350