Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Announced January 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX40 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is pretty close but the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX50 HS was announced 3 years after the Fujifilm F200EXR which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the SX50 HS grades vs the Fujifilm F200EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Fujifilm F200EXR
SX50 HS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | April 2009 | Newer by 46 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Canon SX50 HS
Fujifilm F200EXR | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR
SX50 HS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX50 HS has got outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") having a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SX50 HS and the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR is 65 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX50 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The SX50 HS includes the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF more difficult. The more recent SX50 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-15 | 2009-04-30 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-10L | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $429 | $350 |