Clicky

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000

Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
55
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
  • Introduced January 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX40 HS
  • Replacement is Canon SX60 HS
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Also Known as mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Below is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SX50 HS was released 3 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SX50 HS grades versus the 9000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Olympus 9000

 SX50 HS 9000 
RevealedJanuary 2013May 2009More recent by 45 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size2.8"2.7"Larger display (+0.1")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon SX50 HS

 9000 SX50 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus 9000

 SX50 HS 9000 
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX50 HS provides outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") having a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX50 HS versus the 9000.

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX50 HS and 9000 is 65 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and 9000.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of files though you will need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent SX50 HS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Portrait photography details
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography details
48
you can focus manually
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
20
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX50 HS
Street photography with Olympus 9000
57
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (595 grams)
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than average (225g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Sports photography factors
Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
39
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Travel photography info
Olympus 9000 Travel photography info
53
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (595g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
58
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (225 grams)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Landscape photography advice
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
45
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (2.8")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse mode
31
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Vlogging info
Olympus 9000 Vlogging info
58
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (595 grams)
27
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than average (225g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX50 HS and Olympus 9000
 Canon PowerShot SX50 HSOlympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Olympus Stylus 9000
Also Known as - mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-01-15 2009-05-14
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 50
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.4-6.5 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range 0cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 202k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/2000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 595 gr (1.31 lbs) 225 gr (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 179 not tested
Other
Battery life 315 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-10L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $429 $300