Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a4d/60a4dab016451a3a4719c41906c42e23c6bca8ea" alt="Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62d54/62d540e477b2fc4e185bed99aff836ee8cf05e0d" alt="Samsung HZ25W front Samsung HZ25W front"
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Updated by Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Also referred to as WB5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SX50 HS was manufactured 2 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the SX50 HS grades versus the HZ25W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Samsung HZ25W
SX50 HS | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Canon SX50 HS
HZ25W | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Samsung HZ25W
SX50 HS | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX50 HS enjoys outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") accompanied by a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX50 HS and the HZ25W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3735/a3735c86342a638fe9f39778093796627d489334" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX50 HS and HZ25W is 65 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea8b5/ea8b562bb9a124d293f4505d50c8630e0f002c20" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The image below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and HZ25W.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of files however you should always factor the age of the cameras into account. The fresher SX50 HS should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1036/d10367d68c073e7994adde694bd37bd2d82e101a" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4babf/4babfeeb7d20edb9c6cc9c552a5caebd7faf9e33" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung HZ25W |
Also called as | - | WB5000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-15 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595g (1.31 pounds) | 428g (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $429 | $350 |