Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140
80 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 349g - 104 x 70 x 80mm
- Announced August 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX500 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Canon SX510 HS and Kodak C140, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX510 HS (12MP) and C140 (8MP) and the SX510 HS (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX510 HS was launched 4 years after the C140 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SX510 HS scores vs the C140 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX510 HS & Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX510 HS Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX510 HS over the Kodak C140
| SX510 HS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 57 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Canon SX510 HS
| C140 | SX510 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX510 HS and Kodak C140
| SX510 HS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX510 HS features physical dimensions of 104mm x 70mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.8" x 3.1") having a weight of 349 grams (0.77 lbs) while the Kodak C140 has specifications of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX510 HS and Kodak C140 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX510 HS versus the C140.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX510 HS and C140 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX510 HS and C140.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SX510 HS because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Canon SX510 HS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent SX510 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX510 HS vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX510 HS | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX510 HS | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-08-22 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 349g (0.77 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 70 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.8" x 3.1") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $80 |