Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1
69 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F3.4-6.0) lens
- 441g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2014
- Superseded the Canon SX510 HS
- New Model is Canon SX530 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Canon SX520 HS versus Olympus XZ-1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX520 HS (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the SX520 HS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") boast different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe SX520 HS was introduced 3 years later than the XZ-1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX520 HS scores versus the XZ-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX520 HS Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX520 HS over the Olympus XZ-1
| SX520 HS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon SX520 HS
| XZ-1 | SX520 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 461k | Sharper screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX520 HS and Olympus XZ-1
| SX520 HS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX520 HS has physical measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX520 HS versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX520 HS vs the XZ-1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX520 HS and XZ-1 is 69 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX520 HS and XZ-1.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SX520 HS using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Canon SX520 HS will offer greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger SX520 HS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX520 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX520 HS | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.0 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 441 grams (0.97 lb) | 275 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 320 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $219 | $567 |