Canon SX520 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

In this article, we will be comparing the Canon SX520 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX520 HS (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX520 HS was launched 6 months after the WG-4 GPS and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SX520 HS grades vs the WG-4 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX520 HS & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX520 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.

For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX520 HS enjoys exterior measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 441 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Look at the Canon SX520 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SX520 HS compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX520 HS and WG-4 GPS is 69 and 90 respectively.

In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX520 HS and WG-4 GPS.

As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images though you will need to consider the age of the cameras into account.