Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980
61 Imaging
40 Features
67 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43bce/43bce14d5c185c472e110d1ebbf449a8d31d22c9" alt="Canon PowerShot SX60 HS front Canon PowerShot SX60 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3176/f3176bc983373a77b817a895387f9fe43857440a" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z980 front Kodak EasyShare Z980 front"
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 650g - 128 x 93 x 114mm
- Launched September 2014
- Previous Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Canon SX60 HS versus Kodak Z980, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the SX60 HS (16MP) and Z980 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX60 HS was announced 5 years later than the Z980 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX60 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Kodak Z980 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX60 HS grades versus the Z980 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX60 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z980. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX60 HS Gallery & Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX60 HS over the Kodak Z980
SX60 HS | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 70 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 201k | Crisper display (+721k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Canon SX60 HS
Z980 | SX60 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX60 HS and Kodak Z980
SX60 HS | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX60 HS enjoys outer measurements of 128mm x 93mm x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z980 has measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Check the Canon SX60 HS versus Kodak Z980 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX60 HS and the Z980.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd4c7/dd4c700edf6bf93253386a5d21ee5bff12ce5937" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 size comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX60 HS and Z980 is 61 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb92e/cb92eb02cd2b1abfe6f0093d87939fa41199b346" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 top view buttons comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX60 HS and Z980.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Canon SX60 HS to offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern SX60 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af436/af4365327f446082273dfa6cde2221294ca422a8" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 sensor size comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc146/bc14640314ca55b442f381dc8d3846be5b183a97" alt="Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX60 HS vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-09-16 | 2009-01-05 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 922 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.4 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 650 grams (1.43 pounds) | 445 grams (0.98 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 128 x 93 x 114mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 4.5") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 39 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 127 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $549 | $249 |