Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90
93 Imaging
39 Features
45 Overall
41
70 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1280 video
- 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
- 188g - 104 x 61 x 26mm
- Released January 2014
- Replacement is Canon SX610 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 400g - 114 x 99 x 83mm
- Released February 2009
- Previous Model is Nikon P80
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Canon SX600 HS versus Nikon P90, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Nikon. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the SX600 HS (16MP) and P90 (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX600 HS was released 4 years after the P90 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX600 HS being a Compact camera and the Nikon P90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SX600 HS grades against the P90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX600 HS and Nikon Coolpix P90. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX600 HS Gallery and Nikon P90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX600 HS over the Nikon P90
| SX600 HS | P90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | February 2009 | Newer by 60 months | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon P90 over the Canon SX600 HS
| P90 | SX600 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Canon SX600 HS and Nikon P90
| SX600 HS | P90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX600 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 104mm x 61mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Nikon P90 has measurements of 114mm x 99mm x 83mm (4.5" x 3.9" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 400 grams (0.88 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX600 HS versus Nikon P90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the SX600 HS compared to the P90.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX600 HS and P90 is 93 and 70 respectively.
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX600 HS and P90.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon SX600 HS to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer SX600 HS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX600 HS vs Nikon P90 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Nikon Coolpix P90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Nikon Coolpix P90 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2009-02-03 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.8-6.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G (TFT) | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m (50 cm � 3.5 m (W) / 1.0 m � 2.0 m (T)) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Manual Flash On / Off, Slow Synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1280 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 188g (0.41 lbs) | 400g (0.88 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 61 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 114 x 99 x 83mm (4.5" x 3.9" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | EN-EL5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $700 |