Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
93 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX600 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1280 video
- 25-450mm (F3.8-6.9) lens
- 188g - 104 x 61 x 26mm
- Launched January 2014
- Renewed by Canon SX610 HS
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX600 HS (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX600 HS was released very close to the TG-850 iHS and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SX600 HS scores versus the TG-850 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX600 HS and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX600 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX600 HS over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| SX600 HS | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Canon SX600 HS
| TG-850 iHS | SX600 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Canon SX600 HS and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| SX600 HS | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar generation |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX600 HS enjoys exterior measurements of 104mm x 61mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the SX600 HS versus the TG-850 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX600 HS and TG-850 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX600 HS and TG-850 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration.
Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX600 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
good MP (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Canon SX600 HS as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (188g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment sealing
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX600 HS Sports photography info
Olympus TG-850 iHS Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (330 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon SX600 HS Travel photography information
Olympus TG-850 iHS Travel photography information
lighter than average (188 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.8)
better than average battery pack (330 CIPA)
environment sealing
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (21mm)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Canon SX600 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.8)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
decently wide (21mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (330 shots)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX600 HS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-850 iHS
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1280 resolution)
lighter than average (188g)
slow max aperture (f3.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone jack
decently wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
Photography Glossary
Canon SX600 HS vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX600 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II G (TFT) | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m (50 cm � 3.5 m (W) / 1.0 m � 2.0 m (T)) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Manual Flash On / Off, Slow Synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1280 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 61 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | 330 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $249 | $250 |