Clicky

Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Canon SX620 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
  • 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Introduced May 2016
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Photography Glossary

Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon SX620 HS versus Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SX620 HS was manufactured 4 years after the TG-320 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX620 HS scores vs the TG-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 SX620 HS TG-320 
LaunchedMay 2016January 2012More modern by 53 months
Manually focus  More accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kClearer screen (+692k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon SX620 HS

          

          

            
 TG-320 SX620 HS 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 SX620 HS TG-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither features Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX620 HS enjoys physical dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX620 HS versus Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SX620 HS against the TG-320.
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX620 HS and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SX620 HS and TG-320.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon SX620 HS to provide extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent SX620 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

            Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX620 HS Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
44
 you can focus manually
 decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
 offers face detect focusing
 manual mode not possible
 no external flash support
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
33
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 offers face detection focusing
 no manual focus
 manual mode not possible
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
 Canon SX620 HS as a Street photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
63
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competitors in class (182 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competition (155g)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX620 HS
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
48
 incredible zoom range (25-625mm  25.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 max frames per second low (2.5 fps)
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect AF
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 low fps (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 bad battery life (150 per charge)
 does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Canon SX620 HS Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography advice
71
 lighter than competitors in class (182 grams)
 decent sensor resolution (20MP)
 has built in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 very long zoom (625mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.2)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 environment proof
 MP count decent (14MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (28mm)
 does not have Time Lapse recording
 bad battery life (150 CIPA)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Canon SX620 HS Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography info
50
 you can focus manually
 really wide (25mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 decent sensor resolution (20MP)
 cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.2)
 manual mode not possible
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 no Time Lapse recording
39
 rather wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 environment proof
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
 bad battery life (150 CIPA)
 does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX620 HS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
35
 really wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detect focusing
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competitors in class (182 grams)
 slow max aperture (f3.2)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 no mic jack
32
 rather wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection focusing
 lighter than competition (155g)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 does not have external mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
        
                
        

          

            
Canon SX620 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX620 HS and Olympus TG-320
 Canon PowerShot SX620 HSOlympus TG-320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX620 HS Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2016-05-10 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ TruePic III+
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-625mm (25.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-6.6 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 922 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.5fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 182g (0.40 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 295 photos 150 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $279 $0