Clicky

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
93
Imaging
46
Features
48
Overall
46
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Canon SX620 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
  • 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Introduced May 2016
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SX620 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SX620 HS was introduced 4 years after the GR Digital IV which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX620 HS scores versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX620 HS GR Digital IV 
RevealedMay 2016September 2011Newer by 57 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX620 HS

 GR Digital IV SX620 HS 
Screen resolution1230k922kCrisper screen (+308k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX620 HS GR Digital IV 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX620 HS has got outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check the Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX620 HS and the GR Digital IV.

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX620 HS and GR Digital IV is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX620 HS and GR Digital IV.

Plainly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX620 HS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Canon SX620 HS will resolve extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern SX620 HS should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX620 HS Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
44
manual focus
decent MP (20MP)
provides face detection focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
41
manual focus
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon SX620 HS Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (182g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX620 HS
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
48
great zoom range (25-625mm 25.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
low frames per second (2.5 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery (390 per charge)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon SX620 HS Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
71
lighter than average in class (182 grams)
decent MP (20MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (625mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
67
great battery (390 per charge)
built-in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX620 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
50
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
53
manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX620 HS Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
35
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (182g)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic jack
Photography Glossary

Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Canon PowerShot SX620 HSRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Name Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot SX620 HS Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-05-10 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-625mm (25.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-6.6 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.5 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 182 grams (0.40 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 295 shots 390 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $279 $599