Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
93 Imaging
46 Features
48 Overall
46
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-625mm (F3.2-6.6) lens
- 182g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced May 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the SX620 HS (20MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SX620 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX620 HS was introduced 4 years after the GR Digital IV which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX620 HS scores versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX620 HS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX620 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX620 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2016 | September 2011 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX620 HS
GR Digital IV | SX620 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 922k | Crisper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX620 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX620 HS has got outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Canon SX620 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX620 HS and the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX620 HS and GR Digital IV is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX620 HS and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX620 HS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Canon SX620 HS will resolve extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern SX620 HS should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX620 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX620 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-05-10 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-625mm (25.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.5 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 295 shots | 390 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $279 | $599 |