Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200
63 Imaging
47 Features
67 Overall
55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a11a/2a11a6d1adbc0746cedf4dcd8dbffd313c6a1fce" alt="Canon PowerShot SX70 HS front Canon PowerShot SX70 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Released September 2018
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon SX70 HS versus Casio EX-S200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the SX70 HS (20MP) and EX-S200 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX70 HS was revealed 8 years after the EX-S200 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX70 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX70 HS matches up versus the EX-S200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX70 HS and Casio Exilim EX-S200. The full galleries are available at Canon SX70 HS Gallery and Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX70 HS over the Casio EX-S200
SX70 HS | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 99 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Canon SX70 HS
EX-S200 | SX70 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX70 HS and Casio EX-S200
SX70 HS | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon SX70 HS has got external measurements of 127mm x 91mm x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") along with a weight of 608 grams (1.34 lbs) while the Casio EX-S200 has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX70 HS versus Casio EX-S200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX70 HS and the EX-S200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb4f3/cb4f390025748999dfb67a4080816dd6382ef8e5" alt="Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 size comparison Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX70 HS and EX-S200 is 63 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a44e/0a44e5e4c9a28047b1a6b878dfdc416ffce62697" alt="Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 top view buttons comparison Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX70 HS and EX-S200.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Canon SX70 HS to show more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent SX70 HS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddfe8/ddfe8343be2bf9c40d4d0c2872e40b89e7149c76" alt="Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 sensor size comparison Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a79/a3a7905dc86aa3e9c87c9b1794f7851d73ecf540" alt="Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX70 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2018-09-20 | 2010-08-03 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 8 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 608 gr (1.34 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Battery format | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $550 | $0 |