Canon SX700 HS vs Ricoh WG-4

Below is a thorough analysis of the Canon SX700 HS versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX700 HS (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX700 HS was announced around the same time to the WG-4 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX700 HS grades vs the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX700 HS and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX700 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.

When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX700 HS has got external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX700 HS versus Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX700 HS vs the WG-4.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX700 HS and WG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.

Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX700 HS and WG-4.

Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you should expect similar quality of files but you really should factor the production date of the products into consideration.