Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35
89 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Superseded the Canon SX700 HS
- Newer Model is Canon SX720 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Canon SX710 HS and Casio EX-Z35, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the SX710 HS (20MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX710 HS was released 4 years after the EX-Z35 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX710 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SX710 HS grades vs the EX-Z35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX710 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX710 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX710 HS over the Casio EX-Z35
| SX710 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2015 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 60 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX710 HS
| EX-Z35 | SX710 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX710 HS and Casio EX-Z35
| SX710 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX710 HS provides exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Canon SX710 HS and Casio EX-Z35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SX710 HS versus the EX-Z35.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX710 HS and EX-Z35 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX710 HS and EX-Z35.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Canon SX710 HS to produce more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent SX710 HS provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX710 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX710 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-06 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 6 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $349 | $99 |