Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990
88 Imaging
46 Features
59 Overall
51
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Revealed April 2017
- Earlier Model is Canon SX720 HS
- New Model is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally Known as EasyShare Max
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and Z990 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX730 HS was released 6 years later than the Z990 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX730 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX730 HS matches up against the Z990 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS and Kodak EasyShare Z990. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX730 HS Gallery and Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Kodak Z990
| SX730 HS | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2017 | January 2011 | More recent by 77 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Canon SX730 HS
| Z990 | SX730 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Kodak Z990
| SX730 HS | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX730 HS enjoys external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has sizing of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
See the Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SX730 HS and the Z990.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX730 HS and Z990 is 88 and 68 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX730 HS and Z990.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Canon SX730 HS to show greater detail as a result of its extra 8.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern SX730 HS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX730 HS vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
| Also called as | - | EasyShare Max |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2017-04-06 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.9 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 8.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 300g (0.66 pounds) | 445g (0.98 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $399 | $299 |