Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
66 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Revealed April 2017
- Succeeded the Canon SX720 HS
- Successor is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 550g - 125 x 84 x 102mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Replaced the Nikon P510
- Later Model is Nikon P530
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Canon SX730 HS and Nikon P520, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. The resolution of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and the P520 (18MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX730 HS was released 4 years later than the P520 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX730 HS being a Compact camera and the Nikon P520 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX730 HS matches up against the P520 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS & Nikon Coolpix P520. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX730 HS Gallery & Nikon P520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Nikon P520
| SX730 HS | P520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2017 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 51 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 921k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon P520 over the Canon SX730 HS
| P520 | SX730 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Nikon P520
| SX730 HS | P520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Both are selfie friendly | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX730 HS features outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Nikon P520 has sizing of 125mm x 84mm x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX730 HS and Nikon P520 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the SX730 HS vs the P520.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX730 HS and P520 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX730 HS and P520.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX730 HS to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher SX730 HS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX730 HS vs Nikon P520 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Nikon Coolpix P520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Nikon Coolpix P520 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2017-04-06 | 2013-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-1000mm (41.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.9 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Optional |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 300g (0.66 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 125 x 84 x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 200 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | EN-EL5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $399 | $380 |