Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Announced April 2017
- Older Model is Canon SX720 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX730 HS was unveiled 8 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX730 HS matches up vs the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS & Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX730 HS Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Olympus 9000
| SX730 HS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2017 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 97 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon SX730 HS
| 9000 | SX730 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus 9000
| SX730 HS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX730 HS provides physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX730 HS and the 9000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX730 HS and 9000 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX730 HS and 9000.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Canon SX730 HS to resolve more detail having an extra 8.3MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX730 HS will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2017-04-06 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.9fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 300 gr (0.66 lb) | 225 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $300 |