Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16360/163607a9ee08595bb977a0a20fbe16388ef067c2" alt="Canon PowerShot SX730 HS front Canon PowerShot SX730 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Revealed April 2017
- Succeeded the Canon SX720 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus TG-860, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX730 HS was launched 2 years after the TG-860 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX730 HS being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX730 HS matches up versus the TG-860 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX730 HS Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Olympus TG-860
SX730 HS | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2017 | ![]() | February 2015 | More modern by 27 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Canon SX730 HS
TG-860 | SX730 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus TG-860
SX730 HS | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX730 HS offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus TG-860 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX730 HS compared to the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d7a7/9d7a7a6774c6140ec000d786d7611fc5baa78576" alt="Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX730 HS and TG-860 is 88 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e02b/3e02bd488cb9a9d9aafaa8db48a0b07d3aec20f2" alt="Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX730 HS and TG-860.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon SX730 HS to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4.3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent SX730 HS should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a5f/05a5fb6e6ccf7c79d7bb7b2f15326397b22b8787" alt="Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff08/7ff08cea784fa3bbaaa13e54063f47e2ba017626" alt="Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2017-04-06 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 6 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.9 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300g (0.66 lb) | 224g (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $399 | $279 |