Clicky

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
  • 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
  • Released April 2017
  • Succeeded the Canon SX720 HS
  • New Model is Canon SX740 HS
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

The following is a extensive review of the Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX730 HS was revealed 5 years after the TG-320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX730 HS grades vs the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Olympus TG-320

					

					

						
 SX730 HS TG-320 
ReleasedApril 2017January 2012Newer by 64 months
Manual focus  More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)
Selfie screen  Easy selfies
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon SX730 HS

					

					

						
 TG-320 SX730 HS 
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus TG-320

					

					

						
 SX730 HS TG-320 
Touch screen  Lacking Touch screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX730 HS has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SX730 HS compared to the TG-320.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX730 HS and TG-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Normally, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX730 HS and TG-320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Canon SX730 HS to provide extra detail because of its extra 6.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher SX730 HS should have an advantage in sensor tech.

						Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX730 HS Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography information
48
 focusing manually
 megapixel count decent (20.3MP)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
33
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 focusing manually not possible
 no manual exposure
 no external flash support
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
Canon SX730 HS Street photography features
Olympus TG-320 Street photography features
69
 screen tilts up and down
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than others (300 grams)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proofing
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Canon SX730 HS Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
48
 incredible zoom range (24-960mm  40.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (20.3MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 slow continuous shooting (5.9 frames/s)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 low battery power (250 CIPA)
 no phase detect autofocus
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 weather proofing
 slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery power (150 shots)
 has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Canon SX730 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
72
 lighter than others (300 grams)
 has bluetooth
 megapixel count decent (20.3MP)
 has built in flash
 display is selfie friendly
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 great reach (960mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
 low battery power (250 shots)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
67
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 weather proofing
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 flash built-in
 really wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 not so great battery power (150 per charge)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX730 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
50
 focusing manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (20.3 megapixels)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 low battery power (250 per charge)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
39
 really wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
 weather proofing
 focusing manually not possible
 cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 small screen (2.7 inch)
 no manual exposure
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 not so great battery power (150 per charge)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX730 HS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
74
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 display is selfie friendly
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than others (300 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
 doesn't have external microphone jack
32
 really wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection autofocus
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have external mic jack
Photography Glossary
				
								
				

					

						
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX730 HS and Olympus TG-320
 Canon PowerShot SX730 HSOlympus TG-320
General Information
Brand Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot SX730 HS Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2017-04-06 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 6 TruePic III+
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20.3 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-960mm (40.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.3-6.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.9fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 300 gr (0.66 pounds) 155 gr (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 250 shots 150 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $399 $0