Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Launched April 2017
- Replaced the Canon SX720 HS
- New Model is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon SX730 HS versus Olympus VR-340, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX730 HS was released 5 years after the VR-340 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX730 HS scores against the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS and Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX730 HS Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Olympus VR-340
| SX730 HS | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2017 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 64 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon SX730 HS
| VR-340 | SX730 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus VR-340
| SX730 HS | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX730 HS has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX730 HS versus Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX730 HS versus the VR-340.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX730 HS and VR-340 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX730 HS and VR-340.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Canon SX730 HS to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4.3MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent SX730 HS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Olympus VR-340 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-04-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.9 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 300 gr (0.66 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $130 |