Clicky

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
88
Imaging
46
Features
59
Overall
51
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
36
Features
67
Overall
48

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
  • 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
  • Released April 2017
  • Old Model is Canon SX720 HS
  • New Model is Canon SX740 HS
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Below, we are comparing the Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the SX730 HS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SX730 HS was manufactured 4 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SX730 HS grades versus the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 SX730 HS XZ-2 iHS 
IntroducedApril 2017December 2012Fresher by 53 months
Display resolution922k920kSharper display (+2k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon SX730 HS

 XZ-2 iHS SX730 HS 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 SX730 HS XZ-2 iHS 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX730 HS has got physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Check out the Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SX730 HS compared to the XZ-2 iHS.

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX730 HS and XZ-2 iHS is 88 and 85 respectively.

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX730 HS and XZ-2 iHS.

All in all, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX730 HS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Canon SX730 HS will deliver greater detail due to its extra 8.3MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger SX730 HS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX730 HS Portrait photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
47
manual focus
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
has face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
45
has manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon SX730 HS Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
69
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (300g)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
65
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Sports Comparison

Canon SX730 HS Sports photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography features
48
excellent zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (5.9 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (250 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
good battery power (340 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX730 HS Travel photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography details
72
lighter than average (300 grams)
supports bluetooth
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (960mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (250 CIPA)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
61
good battery power (340 per charge)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (346g)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX730 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
49
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery pack (250 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
54
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
good battery power (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX730 HS Vlogging advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging advice
74
rather wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (300g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of external microphone jack
36
really wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes mic port
screen isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Photography Glossary

Canon SX730 HS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX730 HS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Canon PowerShot SX730 HSOlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot SX730 HS Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-04-06 2012-12-18
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20.3 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-960mm (40.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-6.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 922 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.9 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 300 grams (0.66 lbs) 346 grams (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life 250 photographs 340 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $399 $450