Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200
88 Imaging
48 Features
63 Overall
54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4f6f/a4f6fac94161dab2452736a2d8f71a6dcd09b300" alt="Canon PowerShot SX740 HS front Canon PowerShot SX740 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3819e/3819e71e05320e4850adef6a9b1c035b77326b01" alt="Casio Exilim EX-S200 front Casio Exilim EX-S200 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Released July 2018
- Replaced the Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Canon SX740 HS and Casio EX-S200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Casio. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the SX740 HS (21MP) and EX-S200 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SX740 HS was announced 8 years after the EX-S200 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX740 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX740 HS scores vs the EX-S200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX740 HS and Casio Exilim EX-S200. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX740 HS Gallery and Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX740 HS over the Casio EX-S200
SX740 HS | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2018 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 98 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Canon SX740 HS
EX-S200 | SX740 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX740 HS and Casio EX-S200
SX740 HS | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX740 HS has got outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-S200 has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX740 HS and Casio EX-S200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX740 HS and the EX-S200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/543e0/543e091434d7284e7e576f5b7115c1f01e7c9d44" alt="Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 size comparison Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX740 HS and EX-S200 is 88 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1317/c13171cb3e22aa9e18ab6c998a038dc6c26c54e1" alt="Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 top view buttons comparison Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX740 HS and EX-S200.
To sum up, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon SX740 HS to resolve extra detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern SX740 HS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/601a4/601a4298c06dd2bb86fda00dbc7310918e097850" alt="Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 sensor size comparison Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/517f6/517f6998f531106fad944a7fa45f8fd6b87dc51f" alt="Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2018-07-31 | 2010-08-03 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 265 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $400 | $0 |