Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35
88 Imaging
48 Features
63 Overall
54
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Launched July 2018
- Superseded the Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Casio. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the SX740 HS (21MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX740 HS was brought out 8 years after the EX-Z35 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX740 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX740 HS matches up against the EX-Z35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX740 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX740 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX740 HS over the Casio EX-Z35
| SX740 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2018 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 103 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX740 HS
| EX-Z35 | SX740 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX740 HS and Casio EX-Z35
| SX740 HS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX740 HS has got external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z35 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SX740 HS vs the EX-Z35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX740 HS and EX-Z35 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX740 HS and EX-Z35.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon SX740 HS to provide greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SX740 HS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX740 HS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2018-07-31 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 pounds) | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $400 | $99 |