Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200
88 Imaging
48 Features
63 Overall
54
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Revealed July 2018
- Succeeded the Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix S3250
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX740 HS (21MP) and S3200 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX740 HS was released 7 years after the S3200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX740 HS being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SX740 HS matches up against the S3200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX740 HS and FujiFilm FinePix S3200. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX740 HS Gallery and FujiFilm S3200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX740 HS over the FujiFilm S3200
| SX740 HS | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2018 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 93 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Canon SX740 HS
| S3200 | SX740 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX740 HS and FujiFilm S3200
| SX740 HS | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX740 HS enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the FujiFilm S3200 has measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Check the Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SX740 HS compared to the S3200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SX740 HS and S3200 is 88 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX740 HS and S3200.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Canon SX740 HS to render greater detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger SX740 HS provides an edge in sensor technology.
Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX740 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 |
| Other name | - | FinePix S3250 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2018-07-31 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 540g (1.19 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $190 |