Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75
88 Imaging
47 Features
63 Overall
53
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Announced July 2018
- Replaced the Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the SX740 HS (21MP) and FX75 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX740 HS was introduced 8 years after the FX75 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SX740 HS matches up versus the FX75 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX740 HS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX740 HS Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX740 HS over the Panasonic FX75
| SX740 HS | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2018 | June 2010 | Newer by 100 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Canon SX740 HS
| FX75 | SX740 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX740 HS and Panasonic FX75
| SX740 HS | FX75 |
|---|
Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX740 HS features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SX740 HS vs the FX75.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX740 HS and FX75 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX740 HS and FX75.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Canon SX740 HS to result in extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher SX740 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX740 HS vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2018-07-31 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $139 |