Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
88 Imaging
47 Features
63 Overall
53
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Released July 2018
- Replaced the Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon SX740 HS versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SX740 HS (21MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX740 HS was revealed 3 years later than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX740 HS matches up versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX740 HS & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Canon SX740 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX740 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX740 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2018 | September 2014 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 115k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX740 HS
| WG-M1 | SX740 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX740 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX740 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX740 HS enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX740 HS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SX740 HS compared to the WG-M1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX740 HS and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX740 HS and WG-M1.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Canon SX740 HS to result in extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer SX740 HS should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX740 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2018-07-31 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 images | 350 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $400 | $2,000 |