Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102
88 Imaging
47 Features
63 Overall
53
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 299g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Revealed July 2018
- Previous Model is Canon SX730 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Canon SX740 HS and Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX740 HS (21MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX740 HS was revealed 9 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SX740 HS scores against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX740 HS & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Canon SX740 HS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX740 HS over the Samsung SL102
| SX740 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2018 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 117 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon SX740 HS
| SL102 | SX740 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX740 HS and Samsung SL102
| SX740 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX740 HS offers physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX740 HS and Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SX740 HS against the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX740 HS and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX740 HS and SL102.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX740 HS to provide you with more detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer SX740 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX740 HS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX740 HS | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2018-07-31 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 265 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $400 | $130 |