Clicky

Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800

Portability
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
Canon SX220 HS front
 
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45

Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs

Canon SX220 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2011
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released August 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Canon SX220 HS versus Casio EX-ZR800, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Canon and Casio. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX220 HS (12MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX220 HS was revealed 3 years earlier than the EX-ZR800 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SX220 HS grades vs the EX-ZR800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Casio EX-ZR800

          

          

            
 SX220 HS EX-ZR800 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Canon SX220 HS

          

          

            
 EX-ZR800 SX220 HS 
ReleasedAugust 2013February 2011Fresher by 30 months
Screen resolution922k461kClearer screen (+461k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Casio EX-ZR800

          

          

            
 SX220 HS EX-ZR800 
Manual focus  Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen  Lack of Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX220 HS features outside measurements of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR800 has sizing of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX220 HS versus Casio EX-ZR800 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the SX220 HS versus the EX-ZR800.
Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX220 HS and EX-ZR800 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
In many cases, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX220 HS and EX-ZR800.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SX220 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

            Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX220 HS Portrait photography info
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography info
38
 you can focus manually
 above average flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
 provides face detect autofocus
 no external flash support
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
43
 you can focus manually
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 features face detection focus
 external flash not possible
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Canon SX220 HS Street photography advice
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography advice
57
 image stabilization (Optical)
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Canon SX220 HS Sports photography factors
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
36
 long zoom range (28-392mm  14.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 provides tracking focus
 max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 low battery power (210 shots)
 lack of phase detect autofocus
50
 long zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 features tracking autofocus
 good battery (470 shots)
 slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Canon SX220 HS Travel photography details
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
60
 flash built-in
 decently wide (28mm)
 great zoom (392mm)
 does not have Time Lapse function
 low battery power (210 CIPA)
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
74
 good battery (470 CIPA)
 lighter than competitors in class (222g)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 really wide (25mm)
 long zoom (450mm)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Canon SX220 HS Landscape photography features
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
41
 you can focus manually
 decently wide (28mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 low battery power (210 CIPA)
 does not have Time Lapse function
54
 you can focus manually
 really wide (25mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 good battery (470 shots)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
 Canon SX220 HS as a Vlogging camera
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
34
 decently wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 provides face detect autofocus
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 does not have mic socket
34
 really wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than competitors in class (222g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        

          

            
Canon SX220 HS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX220 HS and Casio EX-ZR800
 Canon SX220 HSCasio Exilim EX-ZR800
General Information
Brand Canon Casio
Model Canon SX220 HS Casio Exilim EX-ZR800
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-02-07 2013-08-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology EXILIM Engine HS 3
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 25-450mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology PureColor II TG TFT LCD Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 3.50 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps),
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight - 222 grams (0.49 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos 470 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-5L NP-130
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $399 $429