Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 9000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-620 was announced 2 months later than the 9000 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-620 scores against the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus 9000
E-620 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-620
9000 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 9000
E-620 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | May 2009 | Similar generation |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 has external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-620 against the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12970/1297059cf0db09b33055949c918f51d916e4a173" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and 9000 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd19a/cd19a37ae43d71c3ee95ca7c4db849dc5e6cc1b0" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and 9000.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same resolution but different sensor sizing. The E-620 comes with the larger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79011/79011b938320a5cba5574dedfe5c509631348b2c" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d4ed/7d4ed3315fe1865a846e3c7e07967ea80d6a5400" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $799 | $300 |