Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030
96 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
95 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the FE-4030 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX220 HS was brought out 14 months after the FE-4030 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SX220 HS grades versus the FE-4030 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon SX220 HS and Olympus FE-4030. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX220 HS Gallery and Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Olympus FE-4030
| SX220 HS | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Canon SX220 HS
| FE-4030 | SX220 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Olympus FE-4030
| SX220 HS | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX220 HS provides outside dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4030 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SX220 HS vs the FE-4030.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX220 HS and FE-4030 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The pic here may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX220 HS and FE-4030.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus FE-4030 to result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent SX220 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX220 HS vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
| Canon SX220 HS | Olympus FE-4030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon SX220 HS | Olympus FE-4030 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-02-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 146 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $130 |
