Clicky

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon SX220 HS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Canon SX220 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released February 2011
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the SX220 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX220 HS was revealed 7 months before the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX220 HS grades vs the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX220 HS GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX220 HS

 GR Digital IV SX220 HS 
LaunchedSeptember 2011February 2011Newer by 7 months
Screen resolution1230k461kClearer screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX220 HS GR Digital IV 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX220 HS has got exterior dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX220 HS and the GR Digital IV.

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX220 HS and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The pic below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX220 HS and GR Digital IV.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX220 HS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Canon SX220 HS will give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged SX220 HS is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX220 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
38
manual focus
above average flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
supports face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
41
has manual focus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX220 HS
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
36
great zoom range (28-392mm 14.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (210 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Travel photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography info
60
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very long reach (392mm)
no Time Lapse function
bad battery power (210 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
67
better than average battery (390 per charge)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography factors
42
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery power (210 shots)
no Time Lapse function
53
has manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX220 HS Vlogging features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging features
34
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic support
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX220 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX220 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Canon SX220 HSRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Make Canon Ricoh
Model Canon SX220 HS Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-02-07 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech PureColor II TG TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/2000s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 190g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures 390 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-5L DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $399 $599