Clicky

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
54
Imaging
44
Features
60
Overall
50
Canon XC10 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Canon XC10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 160 - 20000
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
  • Introduced April 2015
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is very well matched but the XC10 (1") and E-520 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XC10 was revealed 6 years after the E-520 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the XC10 scores vs the E-520 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Olympus E-520

 XC10 E-520 
RevealedApril 2015August 2008More modern by 81 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon XC10

 E-520 XC10 
Display resolution230k1kCrisper display (+229k dot)

Common features in the Canon XC10 and Olympus E-520

 XC10 E-520 
Focus manually More exact focus
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon XC10 provides physical measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has sizing of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

Compare the Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the XC10 compared to the E-520.

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and E-520 is 54 and 68 respectively.

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XC10 and E-520.

Clearly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XC10 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Canon XC10 will give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer XC10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon XC10 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-520 Portrait photography highlights
50
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (1")
includes face detection focus
low MP (12MP)
lacks RAW format
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
56
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
has touch focus
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (1,040g)
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Canon XC10 Sports photography details
Olympus E-520 Sports photography details
47
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
includes tracking autofocus
slow fps (3.8 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
lacks phase detect auto focus
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good battery life (650 per charge)
supports phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon XC10 Travel photography information
Olympus E-520 Travel photography information
43
has touch focus
really wide (24mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (1,040g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
52
good battery life (650 per charge)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon XC10 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-520 Landscape photography advice
50
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12 megapixels)
lacks RAW format
58
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (650 per charge)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
28
really wide (24mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has external microphone port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors in class (1,040 grams)
9
can't record video
Photography Glossary

Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon XC10 and Olympus E-520
 Canon XC10Olympus E-520
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon XC10 Olympus E-520
Class Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2015-04-08 2008-08-20
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC DV5 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 12.8 x 9.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 122.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 20000 1600
Min native ISO 160 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-241mm (10.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 8cm -
Total lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 2.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.8 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) -
Max video resolution 3840x2160 None
Video format XF-AVC, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 1040 gr (2.29 lbs) 552 gr (1.22 lbs)
Dimensions 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 55
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 548
Other
Battery life - 650 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E6N -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Launch cost $1,599 $400