Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Introduced April 2015
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is very well matched but the XC10 (1") and E-520 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XC10 was revealed 6 years after the E-520 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the XC10 scores vs the E-520 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon XC10 and Olympus E-520. The full galleries are viewable at Canon XC10 Gallery and Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Olympus E-520
XC10 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | August 2008 | More modern by 81 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon XC10
E-520 | XC10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 1k | Crisper display (+229k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Olympus E-520
XC10 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon XC10 provides physical measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has sizing of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Compare the Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the XC10 compared to the E-520.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and E-520 is 54 and 68 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XC10 and E-520.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XC10 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Canon XC10 will give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer XC10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon XC10 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
Canon XC10 | Olympus E-520 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon XC10 | Olympus E-520 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-04-08 | 2008-08-20 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC DV5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 20000 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video format | XF-AVC, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1040 gr (2.29 lbs) | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 548 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E6N | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,599 | $400 |