Clicky

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
54
Imaging
44
Features
60
Overall
50
Canon XC10 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Canon XC10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 160 - 20000
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
  • Released April 2015
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Following is a comprehensive overview of the Canon XC10 and Ricoh CX4, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very similar but the XC10 (1") and CX4 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The XC10 was announced 4 years after the CX4 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XC10 grades vs the CX4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Ricoh CX4

 XC10 CX4 
LaunchedApril 2015August 2010More modern by 57 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Canon XC10

 CX4 XC10 
Display resolution920k1kClearer display (+919k dot)

Common features in the Canon XC10 and Ricoh CX4

 XC10 CX4 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon XC10 offers outer measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") along with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Compare the Canon XC10 and Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the XC10 and the CX4.

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XC10 and CX4 is 54 and 92 respectively.

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XC10 and CX4.

Plainly, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XC10 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Canon XC10 will offer more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more modern XC10 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon XC10 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography factors
50
focusing manually
good sensor size (1")
provides face detect autofocus
megapixel count low (12MP)
no RAW files
26
manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon XC10 Street photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Street photography factors
56
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
supports touch to focus
no RAW files
more heavy than average (1,040g)
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Sports photography camera
47
has image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
no phase detect autofocus
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Canon XC10 Travel photography information
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography information
43
supports touch to focus
relatively wide (24mm)
more heavy than average (1,040g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
66
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon XC10
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX4
50
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
no RAW files
42
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon XC10 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging highlights
28
relatively wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with microphone support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
more heavy than average (1,040g)
30
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Canon XC10 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon XC10 and Ricoh CX4
 Canon XC10Ricoh CX4
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon XC10 Ricoh CX4
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2015-04-08 2010-08-19
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC DV5 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 12.8 x 9.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 122.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 20000 3200
Min native ISO 160 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-241mm (10.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 8cm 1cm
Crop factor 2.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.8fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format XF-AVC, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 1040 gr (2.29 lbs) 205 gr (0.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LP-E6N DB-100
Self timer Yes Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $1,599 $211