Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b251/8b2512ffe152268e9dc73c343f6dd23f5eae1e82" alt="Canon XC10 front Canon XC10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the XC10 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the XC10 (1") and WG-4 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The XC10 was unveiled 15 months later than the WG-4 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the XC10 grades vs the WG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon XC10 & Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are viewable at Canon XC10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Ricoh WG-4
XC10 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 15 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon XC10
WG-4 | XC10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 1k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-4
XC10 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon XC10 offers outside measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") having a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the XC10 and the WG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c80db/c80db728248bccf4704e9b54b95f424216a0f282" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XC10 and WG-4 is 54 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72f2b/72f2bb60b528ec05d28eeb793e4e91e6e8bdd6ba" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The photograph here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XC10 and WG-4.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XC10 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 will produce more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern XC10 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f082/1f0823ef330fa7bc5e1994814d5adef661b61485" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison"
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82cdb/82cdb7271e6d42a9e44593c023768250fc3ec6b4" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Canon XC10 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon XC10 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-04-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC DV5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 122.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 20000 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | XF-AVC, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E6N | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,599 | $330 |