Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Older Model is Nikon S9500
- Renewed by Nikon S9900
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-10 and Nikon S9700, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and S9700 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and S9700 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-10 was revealed 2 months prior to the S9700 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-10 grades against the S9700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Nikon Coolpix S9700. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Nikon S9700
| EX-10 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Casio EX-10
| S9700 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Nikon S9700
| EX-10 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 | February 2014 | Similar age | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 enjoys external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9700 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-10 and Nikon S9700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-10 and the S9700.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and S9700 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and S9700.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Nikon S9700 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 232 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | 300 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $456 | $350 |