Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Old Model is Nikon S9700
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Nikon. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and S9900 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and S9900 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-10 was brought out 15 months earlier than the S9900 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-10 scores versus the S9900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Nikon S9900
| EX-10 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Crisper display (+1k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-10
| S9900 | EX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 | November 2013 | More modern by 15 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Nikon S9900
| EX-10 | S9900 |
|---|
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 comes with external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-10 compared to the S9900.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and S9900 is 83 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and S9900.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Nikon S9900 will provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-10 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 289g (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-130A | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $456 | $300 |