Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Older Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly similar but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The VG-145 was brought out 13 months later than the A390 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the VG-145 grades vs the A390 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-145 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Sony A390
VG-145 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus VG-145
A390 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Sony A390
VG-145 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-145 vs the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e57f6/e57f6b5986e07ad63a2f7009aa65e5457d63aece" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and A390 is 96 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9a68/d9a68d976594e3782c571ba72e5ee83d9dda5727" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and A390.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The VG-145 has got the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field harder. The younger VG-145 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/237a4/237a4f7bb0b3c8b3f7cccfa00a38a7de8eb25154" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97e7f/97e7ff565ba9a8c3da4fd34a5fb8c46beab8a60b" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VG-145 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2011-07-27 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photographs | 230 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $500 |