Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-10 was released 23 months later than the TG-320 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-10 scores vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-10 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 23 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-10
| TG-320 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-10 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 provides exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-10 compared to the TG-320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and TG-320 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and TG-320.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-10 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-130A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $456 | $0 |