Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FP3, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FP3 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 3 years later than the FP3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the FP3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FP3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FP3
| TG-2 iHS | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FP3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FP3
| TG-2 iHS | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Panasonic FP3 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FP3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the FP3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and FP3 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and FP3.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Panasonic FP3 to show more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FP3 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.90 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $182 |