Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") have different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-10 was announced 2 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-10 grades vs the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus XZ-1
| EX-10 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 35 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Casio EX-10
| XZ-1 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus XZ-1
| EX-10 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 features physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 versus the XZ-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and XZ-1 is 83 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and XZ-1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Casio EX-10 will result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern EX-10 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 shots | 320 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-130A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $456 | $567 |
