Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Replaced the Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-330 was unveiled 5 years before the E-P2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-330 matches up against the E-P2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-P2

 E-330 E-P2 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-330

 E-P2 E-330 
ReleasedApril 2010March 2006More recent by 49 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-P2

 E-330 E-P2 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 offers physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus E-P2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-330 compared to the E-P2.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and E-P2 is 65 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-P2.

To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus E-P2 to give you extra detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography details
54
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (7MP)
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Olympus E-P2 Street photography features
60
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7MP)
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery (300 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography info
Olympus E-P2 Travel photography info
50
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (7MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
43
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery (300 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography details
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
60
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery (300 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
9
lack of video recording
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect autofocus
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-P2
 Olympus E-330Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus PEN E-P2
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2006-03-18 2010-04-22
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 56
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 505
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $1,100 $799