Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-20, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is relatively close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-20 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-10 was brought out 2 months before the WG-20 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-10 scores vs the WG-20 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Ricoh WG-20. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-10 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-10
| WG-20 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-10 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | February 2014 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 comes with outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-10 and the WG-20.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and WG-20 is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and WG-20.
Plainly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-20 will result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 164 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $456 | $370 |