Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-10 was launched 2 months prior to the WG-4 GPS so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-10 grades versus the WG-4 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-10
WG-4 GPS | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | February 2014 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 provides physical measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 and the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and WG-4 GPS is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 250 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $456 | $210 |