Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung HZ10W, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and HZ10W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-10 was manufactured 4 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-10 scores against the HZ10W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung HZ10W
| EX-10 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Casio EX-10
| HZ10W | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung HZ10W
| EX-10 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 has physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung HZ10W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-10 vs the HZ10W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and HZ10W is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and HZ10W.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Casio EX-10 will produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger EX-10 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also called as | - | WB500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $456 | $300 |
