Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL225, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TL225 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-10 was released 4 years later than the TL225 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-10 scores against the TL225 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung TL225. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-10 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 52 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-10
| TL225 | EX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 922k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL225
| EX-10 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3.5" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 provides outside dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-10 compared to the TL225.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and TL225 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The visual here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and TL225.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor measurements. The EX-10 contains the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The newer EX-10 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 187 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $456 | $488 |