Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-10 was manufactured at a similar time to the WB35F and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-10 matches up against the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-10 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-10
| WB35F | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-10 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 enjoys external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-10 vs the WB35F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and WB35F is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and WB35F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will offer you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $456 | $130 |