Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and S2000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-10 was introduced 3 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-10 scores versus the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Sony S2000
| EX-10 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 47 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Casio EX-10
| S2000 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Sony S2000
| EX-10 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-10 features outer measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 vs the S2000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and S2000 is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and S2000.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Casio EX-10 will provide greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-10 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $456 | $225 |
